Contact

New asthma compensation regulations: Ensuring adequate treatment for affected workers

Back to top

New asthma compensation regulations: Ensuring adequate treatment for affected workers

On 7 June 2024, the Minister of Employment and Labour officially promulgated two significant sets of regulations aimed at protecting workers affected by respiratory conditions. These are the Regulations on Irritant-Induced Asthma for the Compensation Fund (Irritant-Induced Regulations) and the Regulations on Work-Aggravated Asthma for the Compensation Fund (Work-Aggravated Asthma Regulations). These new regulations mark a crucial step forward in ensuring that workers suffering from asthma due to workplace conditions receive appropriate compensation and support from the Compensation Fund. This issue was previously dealt with in various circulars issued by the Director General of the then Department of Labour. Which we refer to below. 

15 Jul 2024 2 min read Employment Law Alert Article

At a glance

  • On 7 June 2024, the Minister of Employment and Labour officially promulgated two significant sets of regulations aimed at protecting workers affected by respiratory conditions.
  • These are the Regulations on Irritant-Induced Asthma for the Compensation Fund and the Regulations on Work-Aggravated Asthma for the Compensation Fund.
  • Both sets of regulations emphasise the importance of recognising and compensating for asthmatic conditions influenced by the work environment, whether directly induced or aggravated by workplace factors.

The Irritant-Induced Regulations define irritant-induced asthma as a “disease characterised by variable airflow limitation and/or bronchial hyper-responsiveness due to causes and conditions attributable to a particular working environment”. This definition underscores the direct link between the working environment and the onset of asthma symptoms.

Conversely, the Work-Aggravated Asthma Regulations define work-aggravated asthma as:

“[A] subset of work-related asthma in patients with pre-existing or concurrent asthma that is worsened, but not caused, by work. The disease is characterised by variable airflow limitation, bronchial hyper-responsiveness, and/or airway inflammation due to causes and conditions not directly related to a particular agent in the working environment.”

This definition highlights that while the asthma is exacerbated by workplace conditions, it is not originally caused by those conditions.

Both sets of regulations emphasise the importance of recognising and compensating for asthmatic conditions influenced by the work environment, whether directly induced or aggravated by workplace factors.

It is notable that Circular Instruction No. 177, dated 29 April 2003, regarding Compensation for Irritant-Induced Asthma mirrors the definition provided in the Irritant-Induced Regulations.

Circular Instruction No. 184, dated 25 February 2005, regarding Compensation for Work-Related Asthma defines “work-aggravated asthma” as “a disease characterised by variable airflow limitation and/or bronchial hyper-responsiveness due to causes and conditions not directly attributable to any particular agent in the working environment.” This definition is slightly different but is still consistent with the Work-Aggravated Asthma Regulations.

The Irritant-Induced Regulations and the Work-Aggravated Asthma Regulations replace the respective circulars. The new regulations represent the most current and authoritative guidance on the matter, ensuring that workers receive fair compensation based on the latest international trends.

The information and material published on this website is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make every effort to ensure that the content is updated regularly and to offer the most current and accurate information. Please consult one of our lawyers on any specific legal problem or matter. We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct or consequential, which may arise from reliance on the information contained in these pages. Please refer to our full terms and conditions. Copyright © 2024 Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. All rights reserved. For permission to reproduce an article or publication, please contact us cliffedekkerhofmeyr@cdhlegal.com.

You might also be interested in

31 Aug 2023

by Louis Botha

Trusts and non-resident beneficiaries: 2023 TLAB proposal a step too far?

The conduit-pipe principle in the context of trusts has long been part of South African law. In essence, it states that income earned by a trust can flow through to the trust beneficiaries, pursuant to vesting of such income by the trust. The amount vested will retain its nature and will be subject to tax in the hands of the beneficiary, if the amount is vested in the beneficiary before the end of the year of assessment.

Tax & Exchange Control

4 min read

15 Mar 2024

Earnings threshold

CDH Associate from the Employment Law practice Sashin Naidoo recently joined Gugulethu Mfuphi on KAYA FM to discuss the earnings threshold announcement by the Minister of Employment and Labour.

Employment Law

15:43 Minutes

26 Feb 2024

by Jean Ewang and Tshephang  Kekana 

Vicarious liability claims arising out of sexual harassment and the passage of time

The High Court recently emphasised the impact of prescription on a claim for vicarious liability arising out of sexual harassment in LM and South African Broadcasting Corporation . (2024) 45 ILJ 189(GJ) 

Employment Law

3 min read

17 Oct 2023

by Corné Lewis

The SCA reconfirms the restrictions of a court where a substitution order is sought in administrative decisions

In The Municipal Manager: The City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality and Others v San Ridge Heights Rental Property (Pty) Ltd (517/2022) ZASCA 109 the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) was confronted with a case in which the owner of a property exhausted all internal remedies before launching a review application; the review application was launched timeously; and even after the launch of an internal appeal, the City of Johannesburg (Municipality) had failed to file reasons for its decisions. In this article, we will explore the principles established by the SCA and their broader implications.

Dispute Resolution

2 min read

11 Jul 2024

by Khaya Mantengu and Zodwa Malinga

Retention Guarantees

Parties to a construction contract usually agree to the obligation to conclude separate financial arrangements with third parties for the purposes of ensuring financial security and project success.

Construction & Engineering

08:06 Minutes

15 Mar 2024

by Jerome Brink and Nicholas Carroll

Transfer pricing has finally washed up on South Africa’s shores

With increasing economic globalisation, revenue authorities around the world continue to shift their focus to issues of transfer pricing. Broadly, this fits in with the global move to combat so-called ‘profit shifting’, a practice where multinational groups attempt to concentrate their profits in low-tax countries in which they operate.

Tax & Exchange Control

10 min read

This website uses cookies to enhance the browsing experience. For more information, please see our Cookie Policy.

Accept Decline