Contact

Cape Talk - Returning to work in the new normal

Back to top

Cape Talk - Returning to work in the new normal

Thabang Rapuleng, Director in the Employment Law practice joined Cape Talk to discuss returning to the office and employment law for employers and employees in the 'new normal'. He unpacks the cornerstone of a good working relationship being honesty, trust and good faith on both the part of the employer and employees. Listen to the interview here (BITLY)

9 Jun 2021 Podcast
Cape Talk - Returning to work in the new normal

Cape Talk - Returning to work in the new normal

Podcast

Cape Talk - Returning to work in the new normal

Podcast

00:00 00:00
Download MP3

Thabang Rapuleng, Director in the Employment Law practice joined Cape Talk to discuss returning to the office and employment law for employers and employees in the 'new normal'. He unpacks the cornerstone of a good working relationship being honesty, trust and good faith on both the part of the employer and employees. Listen to the interview here (BITLY)

The information and material published on this website is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make every effort to ensure that the content is updated regularly and to offer the most current and accurate information. Please consult one of our lawyers on any specific legal problem or matter. We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct or consequential, which may arise from reliance on the information contained in these pages. Please refer to our full terms and conditions. Copyright © 2024 Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. All rights reserved. For permission to reproduce an article or publication, please contact us cliffedekkerhofmeyr@cdhlegal.com.

You might also be interested in

25 Oct 2024

by Leila Moosa

Mental Health Awareness Month: Tips for employers to support their employees

Leila Moosa, Senior Associate in the Employment Law practice, joined Lebogang Mabange on Channel Africa to discuss 'Mental Health Awareness Month: Tips for Employers to Support Their Employees.'

Employment Law

18 Sep 2024

by Tayyibah Suliman and Sadia Rizvi

Summary of the POPIA case of Munetsi v Madhuyu and Another

The Western Cape High Court recently handed down a judgment that applied certain provisions of the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 (POPIA). Mr Munetsi (the applicant), applied to the court seeking relief (a public apology) in light of Mr Madhuyu and another’s (respondents) publication on social media platforms of the applicant’s personal information which he alleged to be defamatory. The respondents published the applicant’s mobile number on Facebook, together with a video. The video prompted the respondents’ followers to contact the applicant, and thus resulted in a large volume of phone calls made to his number. The applicant claimed that such publication breached POPIA’s provisions (without any reference to a particular clause), as well as his right to privacy. 

Technology & Communications

3 min read

5 Jun 2024

by David Thompson and Muzammil Ahmed

Unlocking stalemates: Solutions for shareholder deadlocks

Imagine this – the future of your company hangs in the balance, but the room is split down the middle. Critical decisions are stalled, tempers are flaring, and progress has ground to a halt. Welcome to the frustrating world of corporate deadlocks. Such an impasse can cripple even the most dynamic of companies, turning what should be a strategic collaboration into a stalemate. But fear not, for there are creative solutions designed to break these deadlocks and get your company back on track. In this article, we explore some of these deadlock-breaking mechanisms. We don’t cover possible processes preceding the shareholder deadlock stage – such as referring matters to respective CEOs of shareholders for discussion before going to a vote at shareholder level – which could be used in conjunction with the suggestions below.

Corporate & Commercial Law

5 min read

20 Mar 2024

by Roxanna Valayathum and Keagan Hyslop

Know your limitations: Lessons from English case law on limitations of liability

Managing risk and allocating liability forms the focal (and sticking) point of many agreements, whether transactional (e.g. a sale) or relationship-based (e.g. a services agreement). A limitation of liability clause may be used to limit a party’s liability in numerous ways, whether by time, amount or nature. Not only should a limitation of liability be carefully negotiated – it should also be carefully worded to ensure its interpretation aligns with the parties’ agreed principles. The English case of Drax Energy Solutions Limited v Wipro Limited EWHC 1342 (TCC) highlighted the importance of the wording used in a limitation of liability. The similarities between the rules of interpretation in England and South Africa allow significant lessons to be gleaned from the case.

Corporate & Commercial Law

4 min read

2 May 2024

by Johan de Lange and Zipho Tile

General considerations when providing or taking security

All commercial agreements have varying degrees of risks associated with them – how those exposures are mitigated, underwritten and secured is crucially important for the sustainability any transaction. This article seeks to identify some practical considerations that should be taken into account when taking or providing security. These include key principles on how to keep security simple and focused on its purpose, as well as guidance on how best to mitigate risks, ensuring sustainable and commercially viable agreements, particularly in fundingtransactions. 

Corporate & Commercial Law

7 min read

26 Feb 2024

by Desmond Odhiambo and Sara Ndei

Missed opportunities: The implications of squandering a disciplinary hearing

In employer-employee workplace tales, a person decrying unfair termination is a common scenario. But what about the instances where the employee had a chance to tell their side of the story in a disciplinary hearing, but they let it slip away? This is the story in the case of Okun v Kenyatta University (Cause 363 of 2019) where the employee sought a declaration from the court that his employment was terminated unfairly. The twist is that the employer had extended two invitations to the employee to appear before a disciplinary committee, which were postponed at the request of the employee. Thereafter, it sent a third invitation which the employee refused to honour entirely. What is the implication of squandering the termination process in thisway? 

Employment Law

3 min read

This website uses cookies to enhance the browsing experience. For more information, please see our Cookie Policy.

Accept Decline