Contact

The regulatory journey of drone regulations in South Africa

Back to top

The regulatory journey of drone regulations in South Africa

Haafizah Khota, Senior Associate in the Corporate & Commercial practice joined Hugo Ribatika on Newzroom Afrika to discuss The regulatory journey of drone regulations in South Africa.

8 Jul 2024 06:56 Minutes TV interview

Haafizah states that South Africa's drone regulatory framework, established by the South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA), is relatively new. In 2015, SACAA introduced comprehensive regulations for remote-piloted aircraft systems, making South Africa one of the first African countries to formalise drone usage due to increased adoption in private and commercial sectors.

Haafizah explains that the regulations differentiate between private and commercial use. Private use involves recreational activities, while commercial use involves operations for financial gain. Users must adhere to specific parameters for each category, including licence requirements, altitude restrictions, and no-fly zones.

However, Haafizah explains that non-compliance can result in penalties such as fines or imprisonment. For example, commercial drone users operating without the necessary licences or authorisation from SACAA can face fines up to R50,000 or imprisonment for up to ten years.

The information and material published on this website is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make every effort to ensure that the content is updated regularly and to offer the most current and accurate information. Please consult one of our lawyers on any specific legal problem or matter. We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct or consequential, which may arise from reliance on the information contained in these pages. Please refer to our full terms and conditions. Copyright © 2024 Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. All rights reserved. For permission to reproduce an article or publication, please contact us cliffedekkerhofmeyr@cdhlegal.com.

You might also be interested in

26 Feb 2024

by Jean Ewang and Tshephang  Kekana 

Vicarious liability claims arising out of sexual harassment and the passage of time

The High Court recently emphasised the impact of prescription on a claim for vicarious liability arising out of sexual harassment in LM and South African Broadcasting Corporation . (2024) 45 ILJ 189(GJ) 

Employment Law

3 min read

23 Aug 2024

by Marelise van der Westhuizen

One of South Africa’s watchdogs’ power to issue directives: The subject of litigation

In South African Human Rights Commission v Agro Data CC & Another (Afriforum, Centre for Applied Legal Studies and Commission for Gender Equality intervening as Amici Curiae) ZASCA 121, the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) had to consider whether the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) could issue directives to remedy the violation of human rights in terms of its statutory functions and whether those directives would be binding in nature.

Dispute Resolution

3 min read

28 Nov 2024

by Lena Onyango, Alex Kanyi and Charity Muindi

Value-added tax in land transactions: Lessons from the Sayani Investments case

The charging of value-added tax (VAT) on the sale of land, whether developed or undeveloped, has long been a subject of contention in Kenya’s tax regime. In the recent case of Sayani Investments Limited v Commissioner of Legal Services & Board Coordination (Tax Appeal E448 of 2023), the Tax Appeals Tribunal (Tribunal) provided much-needed clarity on this issue. The Tribunal held that for VAT purposes, the sale of land, including land with a structure (whether a commercial or residential building), is exempt from VAT under Part II, Paragraph 8 of the First Schedule of the VAT Act (Cap.476). This landmark decision highlights the importance of carefully interpreting tax provisions to ensure compliance and avoid unnecessary disputes.

Tax & Exchange Control

3 min read

19 Nov 2024

by Desmond Odhiambo, Daniel Kiragu and Nicholas Owino

Key highlights from the Court of Appeal’s ruling on defamation and responsible journalism

The Court of Appeal has reinforced critical principles in defamation law and the standards of responsible journalism in its decision in Ongwen and Five Others v Omollo and Six Others (Civil Appeal 133 & 150 of 2018) KECA 1444 (KLR), clarifying the duty of care journalists owe when reporting on sensitivematters.  

Dispute Resolution

4 min read

21 Aug 2024

by Carmen McKinlay and Chané Stievenart

When and how to use a ‘ring fenced’ company in B-BBEE transactions and contract mining arrangements to protect your investment

Why would an investor, shareholder or mining right holder insist on using a ‘ring fenced’ company? In this alert we unpack what a ring-fenced company is under the Companies Act 71 of 2008 (Companies Act) and why the use of a ring-fenced company can be an additional mechanism to protect funding and investments. 

4 min read

18 Nov 2024

by Brigitta Mangale and Claudia Grobler

Realising Women's Rights for an Equal Future

Brigitta Mangale, Director in the Pro Bono & Human Rights practice, and Claudia Grobler, Associate in the Dispute Resolution practice, were recently featured in the Sunday Times Celebrating Women issue, where they discussed 'Realising Women's Rights for an Equal Future.'

Pro Bono & Human Rights

1 min read

This website uses cookies to enhance the browsing experience. For more information, please see our Cookie Policy.

Accept Decline