CDH advises Old Mutual Private Equity in relation to the disposal of its investment in Chill and Inhle Beverages to an Alterra Capital Partners-led consortium
- Home
- Home
- CDH advises Old Mutual Private Equity in relation to the disposal of its investment in Chill and Inhle Beverages to an Alterra Capital Partners-led consortium
CDH advises Old Mutual Private Equity in relation to the disposal of its investment in Chill and Inhle Beverages to an Alterra Capital Partners-led consortium
CDH advises Old Mutual Private Equity in relation to the disposal of its investment in Chill and Inhle Beverages to an Alterra Capital Partners-led consortium
CDH's Corporate & Commercial and Competition Law Practices advised Old Mutual Private Equity in relation to the disposal of its investment in Chill and Inhle Beverages to an Alterra Capital Partners-led consortium. The beverage business' key brands include Fitch & Leeds premium mixers, Score Energy and Chateau Del Rei sparkling wine.
You might also be interested in
24 Oct 2024
by Njeri Wagacha
Watch Njeri in conversation with Kageni Mbungu, Anne Muruka and Evelyn Manasseh from M-Kopa
Every month CDH Kenya Partner Njeri Wagacha publishes a podcast 'Njeri Talks Law'.
Corporate & Commercial Law
41:27 Minutes
18 Apr 2024
by Corné Lewis, Claudia Moser and Denzil Mhlongo
What’s in a name? The status of Tax Courts as courts of law
The South African legal system is host to a number of quasi-judicial decision-making bodies which, while having the power to make decisions which are authoritative and may be binding on parties and while conducting proceedings in a judicial manner, cannot be described as courts of law in the proper sense. The High Court in the case of Poulter v The Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (A88/2023) ZAWCHC had to determine whether the Tax Court was a court of law for the purposes of deciding whether a taxpayer could be represented by a layperson in the Tax Court. It should be noted that the Tax Court first considered the issue of a layperson’s right of appearance before it in 2016 (see our Tax and Exchange Control Alert of 9 September 2016), which we refer tobelow.
Tax & Exchange Control
8 min read
5 Jun 2024
by Roxanne Bain
CIPC Announcement on beneficial ownership
CIPC has once again issued a warning in connection with beneficial ownership filings. They notified the public yesterday that with effect from 1 July 2024, it will not be possible to file an annual return unless there has first been compliance with the requirement to submit a securities register and beneficial ownership information or beneficial interest information (as applicable).
Corporate & Commercial Law
1 min read
2 Apr 2024
by Jackwell Feris, Timothy Baker and Veronica Connolly
Early Detection of Fraud and/or Corruption in Arbitrations: Lessons from the Recent English Court Decisions?
Two recent English Commercial Court decisions serve as a warning to dishonest parties hoping to exploit the arbitral process to obtain or enforce fraudulent or corrupt arbitration awards. The English courts generally follow a non-interventionist approach when it comes to the challenge of enforcement of arbitral awards. However, these recent decisions signify that the Commercial Court can and will use its statutory powers to intervene, investigate and order disclosure to uphold the legitimacy of the arbitral process and parties’rights.
Dispute Resolution
7 min read
1 Nov 2024
by Megan Rodgers, Amore Carstens, James Ross, Dean Tennant and Elham Shaik
Legislation on the move: The President signs the Upstream Petroleum Resources Development Act
The Upstream Petroleum Resources Development Bill (now the Upstream Petroleum Resources Development Act. 23 of 2024) (Act) was finally assented to by the President on 25 October 2024 and published in the Government Gazette on 29 October 2024.
Oil & Gas
9 min read
18 Mar 2024
by Imraan Abdullah and Kelo Seleka
The soon to be ‘new’ preferential procurement framework
In addition to regulating public procurement generally, the long title to the Procurement Bill states that the Bill is meant to prescribe a framework within which preferential procurement must be implemented. Of course, this must be so, because the Constitution requires national legislation be enacted to provide for such a framework. It is important to note, however, that in as much as national legislation must prescribe a framework, the prerogative power to create and implement a preferential procurement policy within that framework remains with the individual organs of state and institutions. This was confirmed by the Constitutional Court, and is something that cannot be taken away from procuring entities by the Procurement Bill.
Dispute Resolution
6 min read