CDH advises M&C Saatchi South Africa
CDH advises M&C Saatchi South Africa
CDH advises M&C Saatchi South Africa leadership team in relation to its acquisition of all the shares in M&C Saatchi South Africa held by M&C Saatchi plc.
CDH's Corporate & Commercial and Tax & Exchange Control practice areas advised the purchaser consortium, comprising the M&C Saatchi South Africa leadership, in relation to the acquisition of all the shares in M&C Saatchi South Africa Group held by M&C Saatchi plc. The transaction represents an important milestone for the South African M&C Saatchi business which will, following the transaction, be majority-owned and operated by local management.
You might also be interested in
2 May 2024
by Vincent Manko
The need for businesses rescue to combat extreme rise in liquidations
Vincent Manko, a Director in the Dispute Resolution practice, joined POWER FM to address who qualifies for business rescue and the need for business rescue to combat the extreme rise in liquidations.
Corporate Debt, Turnaround & Restructuring
11:08 Minutes
7 Nov 2024
by Heinrich Louw
Understatement penalties and the benefit of tax opinions: A review of the Thistle Trust saga
We previously reported on the judgment by the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) in the case of CSARS v The Thistle Trust (516/2021) ZASCA 153 (7 November 2022) in our Tax alert of 24 November 2022. We also specifically focused on the issue of understatement penalties that arose in that case in our Tax alert of 1 December 2022.
Tax & Exchange Control
7 min read
25 Apr 2024
by Nicholas Carroll
To BEE or not to BEE
Corporate taxpayers often face the question of how to increase their broad-based Black economic empowerment (B-BBEE) credentials through equity ownership schemes. While it is important for corporate taxpayers to improve their B-BBEE credentials, funding constraints can sometimes create a challenge from a taxperspective.
4 min read
27 Aug 2024
by Neha Dhana and Claudia Moser
Appealing or Rescinding? That is the question when dealing with judgments granted against a person without their knowledge
The Uniform Rules of Court direct that any document initiating legal proceedings must be served by the Sheriff of the High Court on a defendant/respondent. The purpose of this rule is to bring to the attention of the defendant/respondent that legal proceedings have been brought against them. The Uniform Rules of Court, however, do not always require the document instituting the legal proceedings to be personally served on the defendant/respondent. This can lead to a situation where judgment is granted against a person without their knowledge.
Dispute Resolution
3 min read
14 Aug 2024
by Reece May
Price personalisation or price discrimination: Can your computer tell the difference
Reece May, Senior Associate in the Competition Law practice joined Jeremy Maggs on Hot 1027 to discuss Price personalisation or price discrimination: Can your computer tell the difference?
Competition Law
13 Mar 2024
by Vincent Manko, Dipuo Titipana and Denzil Mhlongo
The extent of business rescue practitioners’ powers to suspend a company’s contractual obligations
Chapter 6 of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 (Companies Act) confers various powers on business rescue practitioners (BRPs) once they have assumed their responsibilities to restructure the affairs of a company that has been placed under business rescue. This is achieved through the temporary supervision of the company, and the management of its affairs, business and property, by the BRP; a temporary moratorium on the rights of claimants against the company or in respect of property belonging to the company or lawfully in the possession of the company; and the development and implementation, if approved, of a business rescue plan to rescue the company by restructuring its affairs, amongst other things.
Corporate Debt, Turnaround & Restructuring
4 min read