Kenya’s rising bad loans: A closer look
At a glance
- The Kenyan banking sector is currently facing a significant challenge due to a sharp increase in non-performing loans.
- According to the Central Bank of Kenya (CBK), by December 2024, these bad loans accounted for 16,4% of all loans issued by banks – the highest level recorded in the past decade.
- The increase in non-performing loans has direct consequences for businesses, individuals and the economy as a whole. Strengthening enforcement of existing CBK guidelines, particularly around credit assessment practices, is necessary to mitigate these risks.
What exactly are NPLs?
NPLs are loans where borrowers have stopped making payments for an extended period (over 90 days). According to the CBK Prudential Guidelines (rules set by the CBK for banks operating under the Banking Act), these loans include expired credit lines that haven’t been paid back, overdrafts that exceed their limit for more than 90 days, and financial guarantees that have not been honoured on time. Banks typically categorise these loans as “bad debts,” indicating a low likelihood that they will be fully recovered.
Why are bad loans increasing in Kenya?
Several factors are driving this increase in NPLs. One significant reason is the broader economic environment. Kenya is still recovering from the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, which severely impacted the economy. In 2024, the economy grew at about 4,7%, down from 5,7% the previous year. The country faced additional challenges such as severe drought conditions affecting agriculture, inflation, fluctuations in currency value and a decrease in consumer spending – all of which have put financial strain on borrowers and increased loan defaults.
Bank-specific issues have also contributed to the growing number of bad loans. These include high interest rates, weak internal lending policies and inadequate assessment of borrowers’ ability to repay loans. In December 2024, commercial banks were charging an average lending rate of around 16,89%, which significantly increased repayment difficulties for individuals and businesses.
How do rising bad loans affect the public?
The increase in NPLs has direct consequences for both businesses and individuals. When banks face losses due to unpaid loans, they often respond by raising interest rates and making loan requirements stricter. As a result, borrowing becomes more expensive and less accessible, especially for small businesses and individuals. This reduction in available credit negatively impacts overall economic growth and investment opportunities across the country.
How are banks managing these risks?
To manage the risk associated with NPLs, banks adopt several measures recommended by the CBK Prudential Guidelines. One key measure is provisioning, which means banks set aside money specifically to cover potential losses from defaulted loans. While this protects banks against financial shocks, it also reduces their overall profitability and limits the funds available for new lending.
According to the CBK, loans are classified into five categories, each requiring different provisioning levels:
- Normal loans (performing well) require only 1% provisioning.
- Watch loans (30–90 days overdue) require 3% provisioning.
- Substandard loans (90–180 days overdue) require 20% provisioning.
- Doubtful loans (180–360 days overdue) require 50% provisioning.
- Loss loans (over 360 days overdue) require 100% provisioning.
Additionally, banks may restructure loans by modifying repayment terms or extending repayment periods, seize collateral to recover unpaid amounts, or write off loans they deem uncollectible. Banks also rely on credit reference bureaus to share information about borrowers and identify those who may be at higher risk of default.
Furthermore, CBK regulations restrict insider lending to prevent banks from providing excessive loans to their own officers, directors, employees or major shareholders. According to the CBK Prudential Guidelines, insider lending cannot exceed 20% of the bank’s core capital, and total insider lending must remain within 100% of core capital.
Learning from Nigeria’s approach
Recently, Nigeria’s central bank took decisive action to address similar challenges by requiring bank directors with unpaid insider loans to resign. This proactive step significantly improved corporate governance and helped stabilise Nigeria’s banking sector. While Kenya has similar regulations restricting insider lending, enforcement has historically been weaker. Stronger regulatory action in this area could be beneficial for Kenya.
The way forward for Kenya
Given the critical role banks play in Kenya’s economy, it’s essential to address both economic and bank-specific factors contributing to the rise in bad loans. Strengthening enforcement of existing CBK guidelines, particularly around credit assessment practices, is necessary to mitigate these risks. It will be interesting to see the CBK’s response to the surging level of non-performing loans in the country.
The information and material published on this website is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make every effort to ensure that the content is updated regularly and to offer the most current and accurate information. Please consult one of our lawyers on any specific legal problem or matter. We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct or consequential, which may arise from reliance on the information contained in these pages. Please refer to our full terms and conditions. Copyright © 2025 Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. All rights reserved. For permission to reproduce an article or publication, please contact us cliffedekkerhofmeyr@cdhlegal.com.
Subscribe
We support our clients’ strategic and operational needs by offering innovative, integrated and high quality thought leadership. To stay up to date on the latest legal developments that may potentially impact your business, subscribe to our alerts, seminar and webinar invitations.
Subscribe