To pay or not to pay? An employer’s liability to pay severance pay where alternative employment is secured

In the recent judgment of Khanya Cleaning Group (Pty) Ltd v South African Transport & Allied Workers Union and Others (PR32/2023) [2024] ZALCPE 39 (2 October 2024) the Labour Court clarified the extent of an employer’s duty to make payment of severance pay to an employee dismissed for operational requirements (a retrenchment) in circumstances where the employer played an active role in securing alternative employment for the retrenched employee with a new employer. 

21 Oct 2024 2 min read Employment Law Alert Article

At a glance

  • In Khanya Cleaning Group (Pty) Ltd v South African Transport & Allied Workers Union and Others (PR32/2023) [2024] ZALCPE 39 (2 October 2024) the Labour Court clarified the extent of an employer's duty to pay severance pay where the employer played an active role in securing alternative employment with a new employer for a retrenched employee.
  • Employers that seek to be exempt from the obligation to pay severance pay must be able to demonstrate, on the facts, that they acted swiftly and took an active role in efforts to ensure that their retrenched employees secured alternative employment.

In accordance with section 41 of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act 75 of 1997 (BCEA) an employee who is retrenched is entitled to receive severance pay unless they have unreasonably refused an offer of alternative employment.

The court, in discussing the purpose for which severance pay was established in accordance with the provisions of section 41 of the BCEA, confirmed that the purpose is to compensate employees for the loss of employment through no fault of their own and to act as a cushion from the loss of employment. The exception in section 41(4), which provides that no severance pay becomes payable where an alternative offer of employment is unreasonably refused, is to incentivise employers to ensure the employees obtain alternative employment. This notwithstanding, with reference to the Labour Appeal Court decision in Irvin & Johnson Ltd v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation & Arbitration and Others [2006] 27 ILJ 935 (LAC), the court in Khanya confirmed that the legislature did not intend, in its enactment of section 41(4), that a retrenched employee would be able to secure severance pay and a salary for the alternative employment.

In determining whether the former employees were indeed entitled to severance pay, the court found that the employer was not a passive actor in its former employees securing new employment, in that it assisted the new employer that offered its retrenched employees’ alternative employment.

The judgment confirmed that in circumstances where an employer played a part in securing alternative employment for retrenched employees with a new employer, and sought to be exempt from paying severance pay on this basis, it was not a requirement for it to have negotiated a special term with another employer to offer alternative employment to its retrenched employees.

The focus should be on whether there has not only been collaboration between the former and new employers, but also that the former employer has been swift in assisting the new employer with the information necessary to enable alternative offers of employment to be made to the retrenched employees. This enquiry will be fact dependant and each case will be assessed on its merits.

Accordingly, employers that seek to be exempt from the statutory obligation to pay severance pay on the basis that they have secured alternative employment for retrenched employees must be able to demonstrate, on the facts, that they acted swiftly and took an active role in efforts to ensure that their retrenched employees secured alternative employment.

The information and material published on this website is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make every effort to ensure that the content is updated regularly and to offer the most current and accurate information. Please consult one of our lawyers on any specific legal problem or matter. We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct or consequential, which may arise from reliance on the information contained in these pages. Please refer to our full terms and conditions. Copyright © 2024 Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. All rights reserved. For permission to reproduce an article or publication, please contact us cliffedekkerhofmeyr@cdhlegal.com.